Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects efforts to block prizes worth $ 1 million Musk

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin was rejected on Sunday night Wisconsin Lawsuit of Attorney General Josh Kaul to stop Elon Musk and America PAC from carrying out the planned prizes on Sunday night each $ 1 million to two participants at City Hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Orders came only a few minutes before the event – Supporting Conservative Candidates Brad Schimel – was determined to start.

In particular, the court also rejected the offer from Musk’s lawyer to ask two judges, who had campaigned for the Supreme Court candidate Wisconsin Susan Crawford, to resign.

The verdict came after the appeal court on Saturday denied Kaul’s emergency motion to stop the prize from taking place.

Kaul wrote in the initial submission on Friday that he asked for emergency assistance to stop Musk and America PAC “from further promoting millions of dollars prizes to participants from the planned event on Sunday, March 30, 2025, and prohibited respondents from making payments to Wisconsin voters from vote.”

However, the judge assigned to this case, the honorable Columbia Regional Court judge W. Andrew Voigt, refused to hear the lawsuit before Green Bay Rally on Sunday with Musk – encouraging Kaul’s emergency motion who asked the appeal court to take action.

After the emergency motion was rejected, Kaul appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court to enter on Sunday.

Lawyers to Elon Musk and America PAC then submitted a motion for the rejection of Chief Justice Wisconsin Rebecca Frank Dallet and Jill J. Karofsky.

They argue that because Dallet and Karofsky campaigned for Crawford, and Crawford has been critical of Musk, “To avoid the potential perception of bias and manifestations of the possibility of bias, the Supreme Court Dallet and Karofsky must refuse to participate in this problem consideration.”

The lawyers also framed the planned Sunday night prize as a “spokesman agreement” for a PAC spokesman.

In the initial lawsuit, which was distributed by the Kaul office, Kaul argued that “Musk’s announcement about his intention to pay $ 1 million to two Wisconsin voters who attended the event on Sunday night, specifically conditioned to those who gave a value on April 3, which would be issued by others, who did things that were striking,” Wisconsin, is a striking effort from April “Wisconsin from the Wisconsin High Court, is a striking effort from the value of April 3, Wisconsin from the Wisconsin High Court, is a striking effort from an April country, which will be dried in a striking way of Wisconsin from the Wisconsin High Court, is a striking value of the April value, from Wisconsin from the Wisconsin High Court. Or hold back from the vote, or choose certain people. “

The lawsuit requested an order to detention “forbid the defendant from further promotion from the million dollar prizes to the audience planned on Sunday 30 March 2025,” as well as a temporary detention order “forbid the defendant to make payments to Wisconsin voters from voting,” and relief reliefs to limit and prohibit all actions issued by the defendants issued well in the future.

So far, two political groups that are in harmony with Musk – America PAC and built the future of America – have poured nearly $ 20 million to support Schimel for open seats.

The richest person in the world has used cash prizes in the past, including the controversial $ 1 million draw offered to voters in the Swing state during the election cycle last year as part of an effort to increase the chances of President Donald Trump to win in these countries.

The selection of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, on Tuesday, has generally become the center of political storms, and has become a competition of the most expensive State Supreme Court in American history, according to the Brennan Justice Center at New York University.