Do-Over’s steps for the election of the Deputy Chairperson of the DNC put reformists such as David Hogg in danger

The Democratic National Committee’s credential subcommittee has recommended that the party must once again hold a deputy chairman for complaints that there is a problem with how the vote is taken-steps that put the representatives of David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta’s deputy in the danger of losing their position.

Recommendations, made after the committee ballot on Monday, came after the party officers in February. The subcommittee considerations are based on the challenges proposed by the Deputy Chair of the Candidate Kalyn Free on how the election is carried out.

Free advisors argue that the way some voting is carried out allowing Hogg and Kenyatta to unfairly accept more votes than free, who are also looking for the role of deputy chairman.

This resolution is not a final decision and both Kenyatta and Hogg stripped from their title in the meantime; It must be adopted or rejected by the entire DNC body in electronic or direct voting. The broader voting time is unclear, but party officials say in the statement after the voting that they want to act quickly.

The voting is based on the free challenges submitted at the end of February, before the eruption of dispute between Hogg, the parts of the separate organization we get are supporting the main challenger for old Democrat players, and others in parties who believe that DNC ​​must remain neutral.

But Hogg, a Marjory Stoneman Douglas, who survived from the aim of reforming the Democratic Party, claimed that the committee could not be expelled from his party disputes.

“While this voting is based on how DNC selects its officers, which has nothing to do with me, it is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform a large party over this voting,” Hogg said in a statement after the voting on Monday.

Hogg argues that because of its announcement that the organization will support the main challenger, DNC has “explained that they will delete me … I ran to become the Deputy Chair of the DNC to help make the Democratic Party better, not to defend the unpacious status quo that has caused voters in almost every demographic group that has been away from us.

Kenyatta, in Utas Posted on x Monday night, said he respected the vote, but was frustrated by it. He criticized the focus on Hogg, emphasizing his own work as Deputy Chair.

“I disagree with the verdict, but in the end the committee chose and respected their voices – even when I really did not agree. Secondly, the press had been panting in covering the main character they had chosen – David Hogg. They rushed to do it again. I called BS,” Kenyatta, a representative of Pennsylvania,.

Kenyatta called the committee’s steps as “slap on the face.” He added that he had done a job to maintain the work of representatives of the chair and “frustration” Hogg wanted to make everything about him.

In a statement for ABC News Tuesday morning, free, DNC members and vice chairmen who initially challenged the results, praised the credential committee for “correcting this mistake.”

Free writing, “I always know that the Democratic Party is a free and fair election party. Today, the DNC credential committee confirms that correction of mistakes in the process, and protecting democracy is more important than saving the face. This has never been about Malcolm Kenyatta or David Hogg. For me, this is about ensuring that the Democratic and Democratic Party.

Responding to the decision, DNC Chairman Ken Martin said he was “disappointed to know that before I became the chairman, there was a procedural error in the election of the deputy chairman of February.”

He added: “I thank all our officers for their services, including representatives of Kenyatta and Hogg chairs, and hope to continue working with them at their officers’ posts when this problem is resolved.”